Oecophylla Smith, 1860 valid feminine
Oecophylla Smith, 1860b: 101 Type-species: Formica virescens (now: junior synonym of Oecophylla smaragdina), by subsequent designation of Bingham, 1903: 310.
Junior synonyms
Genus Oecophylla catalogues

Mayr, 1863a: 438; Roger, 1863b: 10; Dalla Torre, 1893: 176; Wheeler, 1922: 945 (Afrotropical); Emery, 1925d: 49; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 220 (Asia); Taylor & Brown, 1985: 127 (Australia); Taylor, 1987a: 49 (Australia); Bolton, 1995b: 298; Fisher & Bolton, 2016: 345 (Afrotropical checklist).

Genus Oecophylla references

Mayr, 1862: 693 (diagnosis); Mayr, 1865: 7 (diagnosis); Mayr, 1867a: 70 (diagnosis); Forel, 1878c: 371 (diagnosis); Emery, 1895l: 772 (synoptic classification); Bingham, 1903: 310 (diagnosis); Arnold, 1922: 608 (diagnosis); Forel, 1917: 250 (synoptic classification); Wheeler, 1922: 224, 228 (diagnosis, species key); Emery, 1925d: 49 (diagnosis); Wheeler & Wheeler, 1970b: 652 (larva diagnosis); Wheeler & Wheeler, 1976b: 63 (larvae, review & synthesis); Dlussky & Fedoseeva, 1988: 77 (synoptic classification); Agosti, 1991: 295 (Oecophylla genus group diagnosis); Bolton, 1994: 51 (synoptic classification); Bolton, 1995a: 1051 (census); Dlussky, 1997a: 53 (in Baltic amber genera key); Shattuck, 1999: 102 (Australia synopsis); Bolton, 2003: 25, 110 (diagnosis, synopsis); Dlussky et al., 2008: 615 (review of fossil species); Dlussky & Perfilieva, 2014: 423 (rock fossil diagnosis); Dlussky & Putyatina, 2014: 251 (diagnosis, compression fossils); Fisher & Bolton, 2016: 344 (diagnosis); Cantone, 2017: 165 (brief male diagnosis); Perfilieva, 2021: 76 (fossil wing imprints), 78 (wing-based diagnosis); Radchenko & Perkovsky, 2021: 1 (Bitterfeld amber syninclusion).

Citations

Extant: 3 valid species, 12 valid subspecies

Fossil: 16 valid species

More statistics