This history item belongs to Chtonolasius Ruzsky, 1912
Its current taxon owner(s) is Chthonolasius
[Chthonolasius also described as new by Ruzsky, 1914a: 59.]
[{tax 509100} also described as new by {ref 128188}: 59.]
Acanthomyops (Chthonolasius) | Subgenus |
Obsolete combination
an obsolete classification of Chthonolasius Ruzsky, 1912
|
Chthonolasius | Genus |
Synonym
junior synonym of current valid taxon Lasius Fabricius, 1804
|
Chtonolasius | Genus |
Unavailable misspelling
a misspelling of Chthonolasius Ruzsky, 1912
|
Lasius (Chthonolasius) | Subgenus |
Obsolete combination
an obsolete classification of Chthonolasius Ruzsky, 1912
|
#239888 (selected) | [Chthonolasius also described as new by Ruzsky, 1914a: 59.] |
#282508 | [Note: the assumption by some authors (e.g. Emery, 1916b: 11; Wheeler, 1916o: 171 (in text); Donisthorpe, 1941f: 37; Donisthorpe, 1943g: 633), that Ruzsky nominated Formica flava as type-species is incorrect. Ruzsky, 1912: 630, included those species "with the appearance of the yellow Lasius (Lasius flavus D.G.) and its closely related species, and races (Lasius carniolicus, Lasius umbratus, Lasius myops, Lasius mixtus)". This is not a direct nomination of a type-species, nor is De Geer (= D.G.) the author of Lasius flavus (Bolton, 1995b: 24).] |
#239889 | Chthonolasius: justified emendation of spelling by Ruzsky, 1914a: 59; Wheeler, 1916o: 170. |
#239890 | Chthonolasius as junior synonym of Formicina: Wheeler, 1916o: 172; Emery, 1916b: 11; Emery, 1916a: 241. |
#239891 | Chthonolasius as subgenus of Acanthomyops: Forel, 1916: 460; Donisthorpe, 1927c: 254; Donisthorpe, 1943g: 633. |
#239892 | Chthonolasius as subgenus of Lasius: Ruzsky, 1912: 630; Ruzsky, 1914a: 59; Wheeler, 1922: 698; Emery, 1925d: 231; Wilson, 1955a: 13; subsequent authors; Bolton, 1995b: 24; Bolton, 2003: 97. |
#239893 | Chthonolasius as junior synonym of Lasius: Brown, 1973b: 179 [provisional]; Hölldobler & Wilson, 1990: 18; Tang et al., 1995: 108; Boudinot et al., 2022: 135. |