This history item belongs to Gesomyrmex Mayr, 1868

Its current taxon owner(s) is Gesomyrmex

Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Gesomyrmecini: Forel, 1912j: 89; Wheeler, 1915i: 107; Forel, 1917: 249. 

{tax 429225} in {tax 509097}, {tax 429220}: {ref 125232}: 89; {ref 130096}: 107; {ref 124997}: 249.
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2012-09-12
  • Updated at: 2023-08-18
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Gaesomyrmex Genus Unavailable misspelling
a misspelling of Gesomyrmex Mayr, 1868
Gesomyrmex Genus Valid
Other history items belonging to Gesomyrmex
#240121 Gesomyrmex in Formicinae: Mayr, 1868c: 50 [Formicidae].
#240122 Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae: Forel, 1878c: 376 [Camponotidae]; Dalla Torre, 1893: 175 [Camponotinae]; Emery, 1896e: 187 [Camponotinae].
#240123 Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Camponotini: Forel, 1893b: 165.
#240124 Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Oecophyllini: Emery, 1895l: 772; Wheeler, 1910a: 143.
#240125 Gesomyrmex in Gesomyrmecinae, Gesomyrmecini: Ashmead, 1905c: 384 [Gesomyrmicini].
#240126 (selected) Gesomyrmex in Camponotinae, Gesomyrmecini: Forel, 1912j: 89; Wheeler, 1915i: 107; Forel, 1917: 249.
#240127 Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Dimorphomyrmecini: Emery, 1925d: 47; Donisthorpe, 1943g: 647.
#240129 Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Formica genus group: Agosti, 1991: 295.
#240128 Gesomyrmex in Formicinae, Gesomyrmecini: Wheeler, 1922: 697; Wheeler, 1929a: 12; subsequent authors; Hölldobler & Wilson, 1990: 17; Bolton, 1994: 50; Bolton, 1995b: 30; Bolton, 2003: 24, 108; Ward et al., 2016: 347.
#311090 Gesomyrmex as genus: all authors.
#311091 Gesomyrmex as senior synonym of Dimorphomyrmex: Wheeler, 1929a: 1 (in text); Hölldobler & Wilson, 1990: 17; Bolton, 1995b: 30; Bolton, 2003: 108.
#311092 Gesomyrmex as senior synonym of Gaesomyrmex: Forel, 1893b: 167; Bolton, 1995b: 30; Bolton, 2003: 108.
#240130 [Gaesomyrmex: unjustified emendation of spelling by Dalla Torre, 1893: 175.]
#279102 [Note: Gaesomyrmex was treated as a junior synonym of Gesomyrmex by Forel, 1893b: 167; Bolton, 1995b: 30; Bolton, 2003: 108, but is perhaps best regarded as an unjustified emendation.]