[Note: Zettel et al., 2016: 136, 141, suggest that Diacamma rugosum ceylonense moicum Forel, 1911f was made available by Santschi, 1932d: 14. But in Santschi’s text he merely mentions “la var. moicum”, which is interpreted here as an abbreviated writing of the full quadrinomial, not as a statement of change of taxonomic status.]

[Note: {ref 143046}: 136, 141, suggest that {prottac 201097} was made available by {ref 128404}: 14. But in Santschi’s text he merely mentions “la var. <i>moicum</i>”, which is interpreted here as an abbreviated writing of the full quadrinomial, not as a statement of change of taxonomic status.]