Closed issue: Subspecies without a genus
Added by Fredrik Palmkron almost 8 years ago
—
Closed by Flávia Esteves
None of these subspecies have a genus. It should not be allowed by the database, but somehow we ended up like this.
%taxon497190, %taxon497191, %taxon497192, %taxon497193, %taxon497194, %taxon497195, %taxon497309, %taxon497310, %taxon504461
Generated by running:
Subspecies.where(genus: nil).pluck(:id)
Note: There seems to be an issue with capitalization in three of these names, but 4544 taxa in total are affected by that issue so it will be dealt with in another task.
Fredrik Palmkron commented almost 7 years ago: show rawThere's now a database script for this: "[Catalog: Subspecies without genus](/database_scripts/subspecies_without_genus)".
There's now a database script for this: "Catalog: Subspecies without genus".