This history item belongs to Formica pubescens Fabricius, 1775

Its current taxon owner(s) is Camponotus pubescens

Latreille, 1802a: 97 (q.m.); Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835: 211 (q.m.); Schenck, 1852: 124 (q.m.)


{ref 126800}: 97 (q.m.); {ref 126873}: 211 (q.m.); {ref 128471}: 124 (q.m.)
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2012-09-12
  • Updated at: 2021-03-27
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Camponotus herculeanus pubescens Subspecies Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus pubescens (Fabricius, 1775)
Camponotus pubescens Species Synonym
junior synonym of current valid taxon Camponotus vagus (Scopoli, 1763)
Formica pubescens Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus pubescens (Fabricius, 1775)
Other history items belonging to Formica pubescens
#248494 (selected) Latreille, 1802a: 97 (q.m.); Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835: 211 (q.m.); Schenck, 1852: 124 (q.m.)
#248496 Combination in Camponotus: Mayr, 1861: 36 (in key).
#248497 Subspecies of Camponotus herculeanus: Forel, 1879a: 59.
#248498 Status as species: Fabricius, 1782: 489; Fabricius, 1787: 308; Gmelin, 1790: 2798; Christ, 1791: 511; Fabricius, 1793: 352; Latreille, 1798: 34; Latreille, 1802a: 96; Walckenaer, 1802: 159; Fabricius, 1804: 399; Jurine, 1807: 272; Latreille, 1809: 126; Latreille, 1817a: 97; Lamarck, 1817: 95; Stephens, 1829b: 356; Losana, 1834: 312; Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835: 211 (redescription); Brullé, 1840: 84; Nylander, 1846a: 899; Lucas, 1849: 302; Schenck, 1852: 124; Mayr, 1855: 310 (redescription); Nylander, 1856b: 56; Gredler, 1858: 3; Smith, 1858a: 11; Motschoulsky, 1860a: 500; Mayr, 1861: 36 (in key); Mayr, 1863a: 400; Roger, 1863b: 1; Emery, 1869b: 2; Dours, 1873: 164; Forel, 1874: 40 (in key); André, 1874b: 176 (in key); Emery, 1878: 44; Emery & Forel, 1879: 447; André, 1882b: 142 (in key); Costa, 1883: 60; Forel, 1886e: clxvii; Cresson, 1887: 255; Nasonov, 1889: 12; Ruzsky, 1895: 8.
#248499 Junior synonym of Camponotus vagus: Olivier, 1792: 492; Latreille, 1802a: 96; Fabricius, 1804: 399; Stephens, 1829b: 356; Nylander, 1846a: 899; Mayr, 1855: 310; Smith, 1858a: 11; Roger, 1863b: 1; André, 1874c: 201 (in list); Forel, 1874: 96 (in list); Forel, 1879a: 56; Emery, 1891c: 20; Forel, 1892j: 306; Dalla Torre, 1893: 255; Emery, 1896j: 372 (in list); Ruzsky, 1905b: 241; Forel, 1907h: 15; Bondroit, 1910: 488; Forel, 1915d: 68 (in key); Emery, 1916a: 225; Soudek, 1922b: 94; Emery, 1925d: 74; Lomnicki, 1928: 10; Karavaiev, 1936: 183; Pisarski, 1961: 161; Bernard, 1967a: 341; Baroni Urbani, 1971c: 179; Pisarski, 1975: 30; Kutter, 1977c: 205; Bolton, 1995b: 118; Radchenko, 1997b: 558; Gallé et al., 1998: 216; Czechowski et al., 2002: 97; Casevitz-Weulersse & Galkowski, 2009: 480; Csősz et al., 2011: 58; Czechowski et al., 2012: 245; Radchenko, 2016: 331.
#290937 [Note: all authors prior to Emery, 1891c: 20, give Camponotus pubescens as senior synonym, but Camponotus vagus has priority.]