This history item belongs to Formica carinata Fabricius, 1804
Its current taxon owner(s) is Polyrhachis carinata
- Item type: taxt
- Created at: 2012-09-12
- Updated at: 2023-06-13
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
| Formica carinata | Species |
Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Polyrhachis carinata (Fabricius, 1804)
|
| Polyrhachis carinata | Species | Valid |
Other history items belonging to Formica carinata
| #290852 | Combination in Myrma: Billberg, 1820: 104. |
| #266564 | Combination in Polyrhachis: Smith, 1857a: 59. |
| #266565 | Unplaced to subgenus: Emery, 1925d: 209. |
| #266566 (selected) | Combination in Polyrhachis (Myrma): Dorow, 1995: 32. |
| #283030 | Status as species: Billberg, 1820: 104; Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835: 220; Smith, 1857a: 59; Roger, 1863b: 9; Mayr, 1863a: 444; Smith, 1871a: 313; Dalla Torre, 1893: 260; Emery, 1896j: 380 (in list); Emery, 1925d: 209; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 304; Bolton, 1995b: 345; Dorow, 1995: 32. |
| #283031 | [Note: Polyrhachis carinata , sensu Smith, 1858a: 71, pl. 4, figs. 48, 49 (w.) South Africa, is a misidentification of Polyrhachis carinata , not a separate taxon. Mayr, 1863a: 444 treated Polyrhachis carinatus as a valid species, which led later authors (Bolton, 1973b: 318; Bolton, 1995b: 356; Dorow, 1995: 39) to mistakenly regard it as a junior homonym of Polyrhachis carinata . Smith, 1858a himself (p. 71, in text) said of his African material, “This insect is very probably the worker of Polyrhachis militaris,” an opinion repeated by Roger, 1863b: 6. Otherwise, Dalla Torre, 1893: 260, referred the African material to Polyrhachis cafrorum , while Emery, 1896j: 379; Wheeler, 1922a: 261; Emery, 1925d: 200, referred it to Polyrhachis rugulosa . Bolton, 1973b: 318, and later authors, referred it to Polyrhachis schistacea .] |