This history item belongs to Formica carinata Fabricius, 1804
Its current taxon owner(s) is Polyrhachis carinata
[Note: Polyrhachis carinata , sensu Smith, 1858a: 71, pl. 4, figs. 48, 49 (w.) South Africa, is a misidentification of Polyrhachis carinata , not a separate taxon. Mayr, 1863a: 444 treated Polyrhachis carinatus as a valid species, which led later authors (Bolton, 1973b: 318; Bolton, 1995b: 356; Dorow, 1995: 39) to mistakenly regard it as a junior homonym of Polyrhachis carinata . Smith, 1858a himself (p. 71, in text) said of his African material, “This insect is very probably the worker of Polyrhachis militaris,” an opinion repeated by Roger, 1863b: 6. Otherwise, Dalla Torre, 1893: 260, referred the African material to Polyrhachis cafrorum , while Emery, 1896j: 379; Wheeler, 1922a: 261; Emery, 1925d: 200, referred it to Polyrhachis rugulosa . Bolton, 1973b: 318, and later authors, referred it to Polyrhachis schistacea .]
[Note: {taxac 445511}, <i>sensu</i> {ref 128685}: 71, pl. 4, figs. 48, 49 (w.) South Africa, is a misidentification of {taxac 445511}, not a separate taxon. {ref 127213}: 444 treated {taxac 445512} as a valid species, which led later authors ({ref 122836}: 318; {ref 122860}: 356; {ref 124382}: 39) to mistakenly regard it as a junior homonym of {taxac 445511}. {ref 128685} himself (p. 71, in text) said of his African material, “This insect is very probably the worker of {tax 445936},” an opinion repeated by {ref 128094}: 6. Otherwise, {ref 124002}: 260, referred the African material to {taxac 445503}, while {ref 124614}: 379; {ref 130148}: 261; {ref 124775}: 200, referred it to {taxac 446135}. {ref 122836}: 318, and later authors, referred it to {taxac 446153}.]
Formica carinata | Species |
Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Polyrhachis carinata (Fabricius, 1804)
|
Polyrhachis carinata | Species | Valid |
#290852 | Combination in Myrma: Billberg, 1820: 104. |
#266564 | Combination in Polyrhachis: Smith, 1857a: 59. |
#266565 | Unplaced to subgenus: Emery, 1925d: 209. |
#266566 | Combination in Polyrhachis (Myrma): Dorow, 1995: 32. |
#283030 | Status as species: Billberg, 1820: 104; Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835: 220; Smith, 1857a: 59; Roger, 1863b: 9; Mayr, 1863a: 444; Smith, 1871a: 313; Dalla Torre, 1893: 260; Emery, 1896j: 380 (in list); Emery, 1925d: 209; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 304; Bolton, 1995b: 345; Dorow, 1995: 32. |
#283031 (selected) | [Note: Polyrhachis carinata , sensu Smith, 1858a: 71, pl. 4, figs. 48, 49 (w.) South Africa, is a misidentification of Polyrhachis carinata , not a separate taxon. Mayr, 1863a: 444 treated Polyrhachis carinatus as a valid species, which led later authors (Bolton, 1973b: 318; Bolton, 1995b: 356; Dorow, 1995: 39) to mistakenly regard it as a junior homonym of Polyrhachis carinata . Smith, 1858a himself (p. 71, in text) said of his African material, “This insect is very probably the worker of Polyrhachis militaris,” an opinion repeated by Roger, 1863b: 6. Otherwise, Dalla Torre, 1893: 260, referred the African material to Polyrhachis cafrorum , while Emery, 1896j: 379; Wheeler, 1922a: 261; Emery, 1925d: 200, referred it to Polyrhachis rugulosa . Bolton, 1973b: 318, and later authors, referred it to Polyrhachis schistacea .] |